Choice factors in international Academic job change

Our research in 2011/12 set out to investigate the most important factors in international academic job change and the role of reputation in this process.

Academics move to join a university for a number of motivations and many factors play a part in crystallising their choice of where to work. Salary, facilities, freedom of expression, the preferences of partners and family, language, legal limitations (e.g. visas), are all considered, but the hypothesis is that reputational factors (essentially, prestige perceptions) play a dominant part. The question is, how important is reputation in the job decision process? Reputation may come into play at the level of country or region, University brand, department, institute, research teams and most likely, the standing of the lead academic.
We interviewed 51 academics in 12 world ranked universities who had, on average, worked in three different countries.

The interviews were semi-structured along the following lines:

Two exercises were also introduced where time allowed:


We asked interviewees to rank various factors relating to career progression in order of importance and identify any missing factors that were important when changing jobs.


We asked the interviewees to rank universities according to their own understanding of reputation. Ten universities were chosen because they ranked fairly consistently in the THE and SJT world rankings, and were separated by around 10 points in both. This allowed us to eliminate the ranking differences, and concentrate on comparing rankings and perceptions. We also introduced the academic’s own university, and asked them to place that in the ranking.


2011/12 W100 Members can access the complete set of project files in the Research Library. Other members can download the Summary only.

Purchase a copy

Contact W100 Research Manager, Lisa Bould, to find out more about purchasing full access to this research. Available to members and non-members of the Network.